The recurrent cycle still looks like a checkride
The authority accepts a mixed EBT programme. The recurrent sessions have to become an evaluation phase that finds weaknesses and training phases that work on them, and the next cycle has to start from what the last one found.
- Restructuring the programme into evaluation, manoeuvres and scenario phases
- Carrying weak competencies from the evaluation into training
- Recording threats and errors, not just outcomes
Phases that know their role, and carry-forward that just happens
Each phase of the programme is marked as evaluation, manoeuvres or scenario. When the evaluation phase ends, Qualify works out the trainee's weak competencies and puts them on the training phases as focus points. The instructor sees them in the briefing, before the session starts.
- Threats, errors and undesired states recorded during the flight or session, with the competency that caught them
- Pass rules that notice a decline over consecutive checks
- Session feedback on whether the targeted competencies improved
Training paths shaped by real weaknesses
- Each trainee's scenario phase targets what their evaluation found
- Fleet Microscope shows the threats and errors that keep recurring, and where a refresher is due
- The programme's compliance matrix links the EBT clauses to the phases that satisfy them
- Instructor agreement tracked as the grading philosophy changes
Two months to a running EBT cycle
Programme design
Phases, gates, attempts, the forms for each phase and the clauses they satisfy.
Forms and framework
Competency forms with threat and error recording, on your framework or the built-in one.
Instructor onboarding
Grading on the iPad, the briefing view, focus competencies, a first calibration.
First cycle
Enrolments, sessions, the review queue, and the Microscope watching the first results.