Everyone had a feeling, nobody had the number
Three instructors each saw one weak session. None of them saw the other two. The pattern was in the records all along, but the records were read one at a time, and the trainee heard about it when the check failed.
- Sessions graded by different instructors, never read together
- No agreed line between a bad day and a trend
- A flagged trainee forgotten by the next roster
A risk score, a watch list, and what changed since you last looked
Every approved check feeds the trainee's page in the Microscope: pass rate, trend, competency profile, the threats and errors behind them, and a risk pill judged against thresholds your department set. Pin someone to your watch list and it keeps a snapshot of where they stood, so the question "has this improved since I flagged it?" has an answer.
- The last five checks against everything before, improving or declining
- Compared with peers in the same role, under the same filters
- Notes and actions for the next reviewer, on the record
- Instructors' session feedback pooled, with names only where signed
The conversation, with the file to hand
- A printable trainee file: numbers, strengths and weaknesses, recommendations, recent checks
- The morning briefing offering the trainee before the next session, not after
- A remedial item added to the enrolment, graded by the instructor you name
- Every opening of the file on the record, who and when
From a weak session to a plan
The check is approved
The trainee's page updates: pass rate, trend, competencies, threats and errors.
The risk pill turns
Judged against the thresholds in your Microscope settings, the same for everyone.
Pinned to the watch list
With a snapshot of today's numbers, so next month's comparison is honest.
The file is printed for the review
Under the same filters the page was showing, and logged like any other read.
The remedial session is booked
An item on the enrolment, an instructor named on it, a session the invitation follows.