Lagary Contact us
Qualifyby Lagary Get a demo
Product
Forms & Records E-Forms Instructor App Programmes & Scheduling Simulators & Resources People & Credentials Microscope Compliance
Who it's for
Airlines, Training Centers, Flight Schools Use cases
Company
Lagary Security & privacy Get a demo
Home › Questions & answers
Questions & answers

What training departments ask us.

Straight answers. Anything missing lives in the user guide inside the product, or with us.

Yes. Forms and their attachments are already on the iPad, drafts save as you go, and finished forms upload on their own when the connection returns. Nothing is sent twice.
No. A reviewer can send the form back for correction with a note, and only the inputs reopen. The grades stay as the instructor gave them, and every step is on the record.
It opens from the session or from the programme item, with the trainee, the date and the simulator already filled in. Opened on its own, the app offers the matching session and checks whether a draft already exists.
Yes. One tab per trainee, each with their history and previous grades a swipe away, and threats and errors recorded as they happen.
The instructor, then a reviewer, then an approver. The trainee acknowledges the result from the phone. Nothing counts until all of that has happened.
Yes. Upload the authority's form or your own layout once, say which of its fields takes which value once, and from then on every check on that form exports into it in a second, in the browser. A fillable PDF is mapped field by field; a scanned form is mapped by drawing boxes on the page. The audit dossier stays beside it.
No. Task-based checks, competency-based checks and mixed forms all work, and they stay comparable in the Microscope because they share one catalogue of tasks and manoeuvres.
The IATA and ICAO pilot competency framework, an instructor and evaluator framework, the ICAO way of classifying threats and errors, and a catalogue of EASA, ICAO and IATA clauses for the compliance matrix. You add your own authority, your own framework and your own forms.
You copy it, change the copy, publish it and retire the original. Every published form is locked, and each record always shows the version it was graded on.
By the rule you set on the form, shown in plain words: any item below the line, a section that must pass, a decline over consecutive checks. Comments become mandatory where your policy says so.
No. It records a judgement about which clauses a programme satisfies; it never blocks an enrolment. Instructor authorisation checks at booking are separate and can warn or block, as you prefer.
Yes. E-forms are for safety reports, fatigue reports and anything else a crew member files rather than is graded on. Same builder, same iPad, same review chain, signed inside the form. A separate team can run them without seeing a single grade.
For a trainee: pass rate, trend, competency profile, the threats and errors behind them, and whether they need a conversation. For a fleet: the same, pooled, with recommendations. For an instructor: how they grade, whether that is drifting, and how closely they agree with their peers.
The trainee, the instructors assigned to them, and the examiners and managers who run the department. Every view is on the record, and instructor names are hidden in fleet views unless someone is allowed to see them.
Yes. A summary translated to the IATA framework, with names removed, is one of the built-in exports.
In calibration sessions, several instructors grade the same evidence without seeing each other's marks. The report shows how closely they agree, competency by competency, against a standard your department sets.
Pin them to your watch list. It keeps a snapshot of where they stood when you pinned them, so "has this improved since I flagged it?" is answered without remembering the number. The morning briefing and the risk score on their page do the rest.
From the records themselves. When a recurrent programme is completed, the next due date is set and the next enrolment can be created for you. A failed check never moves the date forward.
A snag that affects serviceability takes the device out of the schedule at once, and no session can be booked on it until the snag is resolved. Maintenance windows and operating hours are respected the same way.
The credentials tracker lists everything with an expiry date across the whole crew, soonest first. Filter it to the next thirty days and you have the renewal list. Notification rules warn on the same data, and at booking an instructor without the authorisation a session needs is warned about or blocked, as you set it.
Notification rules name an event, the form or programme it applies to, and who is told. Each person chooses how they are reached: in the app, by email or by push, with a do-not-disturb switch and calendar invitations that update themselves when a session moves. Queues and lists refresh on their own while the panel is open.
Yes. Calendar invitations reach any calendar, every list and export opens in a spreadsheet, and there is a documented way for crew, rostering and quality systems to read from and write to Qualify.
English today. More languages are next.
A demo takes an hour. A department typically runs its first cycle on Qualify within two months: forms rebuilt, history brought in, instructors trained on the iPad.